There exist many different principles of science–and specifically social science–which can be related to the field of cybersecurity. A simple first principle to explain the connection to is relativism: the idea that all things are related. Think of it like an ecosystem: technology evolves and so do the plants and animals–different types of technology users in this metaphor–adapt to live in this environment. As technology grows it is easy to both use what is provided as well as exploit it for personal gain. Those who wish to preserve the ecosystem fight against those who are selfish which creates a balanced environment of cyber criminal versus cybersecurity; in essence, all advancements in digital technology ultimately leads back and relates to cybersecurity.

The next principle, objectivity, relates as with the field of cybersecurity growing, many questions of how to ethically handle different types of cybercrime eventually arise. While many can hold strong opinions on the subject, it is important to not let pre-established opinions solely shape decisions and to come into arguments with an objective lens.

Parsimony means that those who research cybersecurity should keep their explanations of concepts involved as simple and understandable as possible.

Empiricism grounds cybersecurity analysts to stick to what they can verify with their own senses instead of relying on feelings, hunches, and opinions without backing evidence. Ethical neutrality binds cybersecurity researchers to ethical standards that they should follow when considering scenarios, opportunities, and implications.

Finally, determinism relates in the sense that while outside factors do aid in determining a person’s choice to commit cyber crime, they cannot be fully excused from their accountability of their own actions because of said factors.